If you’ve ever wondered how you can make Lightroom Classic faster in the Develop module then converting your Raw files to DNG may be part of the answer.
To understand why, first we need to understand that Lightroom Classic uses a different type of preview in the Develop module than it does in the Library module.
Here’s how it works.
Previews in the Lightroom Classic Library module
When you import your images into Lightroom Classic you’re given the choice of building either Minimal, Embedded & Sidecar, Standard or 1:1 previews. These are used by the Library module, but not the Develop module, to display previews of the photos in your Catalog.
Note: I recommend you select Standard if you don’t want to zoom into your photos in the Library module, or 1:1 if you do. 1:1 previews take longer to build as they are larger and contain more data.
Above: Lightroom Classic uses Minimal, Embedded & Sidecar, Standard or 1:1 previews to display photos in the Library module.
Previews in the Lightroom Classic Develop module
Lightroom Classic builds a different preview in the Develop module based on the current state of your Raw file, taking into account the developing you have carried out on it. The preview is updated every time you do something new to the photo.
Above: Lightroom Classic builds previews in the Develop module as they are needed. Using DNG means Lightroom Classic can build previews faster, saving you time.
This is where converting your Raw files to DNG comes in. DNG (short for digital negative) is an open source Raw file format created by Adobe.
When you convert a file to DNG in Lightroom Classic it adds something called Fast Load Data to the file. This is a partially processed preview that lets Lightroom Classic render previews faster in the Develop module.
The speed savings are impressive. Adobe says a DNG file with fast load data will load up to eight times faster than one without it. The more cores your computer’s processor has, the greater the gains, as each core can build a different part of the preview at the same time. This isn’t possible with other Raw files.
Another benefit is that DNG files are smaller than other Raw formats, and take up to 20% less hard drive space. High volume shooters will appreciate this.
Converting files to DNG in Lightroom Classic
The easiest way to convert your Raw files to DNG is to do it when you import them into Lightroom Classic.
Make sure you go to the File Handling tab in Preferences and tick the Embed Fast Load Data box (below), otherwise you will miss out on the speed increase that DNG gives you.
You should also import your files from the camera’s memory card rather than copy them to an external hard drive before the import.
These are the key steps to follow during the import.
Select Copy as DNG in the Import window. This tells Lightroom to copy the Raw files from the memory card to the specified folder on your hard drive and convert them to DNG.
Set Build Previews to 1:1 or Standard in the File Handling panel.
After the import, go to the Catalog panel, select Previous Import, select all the photos in the Collection and go to Library > Validate DNG files. Lightroom checks the new DNG files to make sure they aren’t corrupted, and puts any corrupted files in a Temporary Collection in the Catalog panel. I’ve never seen a corrupt DNG file, so I don’t think it happens often.
This ability to check DNG files to see if they are corrupted is another benefit of the format.
What if my camera uses the DNG format?
Some Leica and Hasselblad cameras already save files in the DNG format. There’s also at least one Pentax camera that gives you the option of using either DNG or Pentax’s own Raw format (.PEF). Some iPhones and Android smartphones also use DNG.
This seems convenient, but bear in mind that camera generated DNG files don’t contain Fast Load Data. Only DNG files created by Adobe software do.
The case against using DNG in Lightroom Classic
The case for DNG is impressive but there are some situations when DNG might not be the right solution for you.
It extends the time required to import your photos into Lightroom Classic. If you’re in a hurry, you may choose to avoid using DNG to save time. Otherwise, get into the habit of importing photos when you have something else to do while your computer gets on with it.
Not all applications open DNG. If you ever use, or think you may use, software that doesn’t recognize the DNG format you should probably stick with your camera’s native Raw format. Examples include Canon’s DPP and Capture One Pro.
Smart Previews and DNG
If you really want Lightroom Classic’s Develop module to run as fast as possible then you should use Smart Previews. They are even faster than DNG (with one exception, which we’ll come to shortly). You may be tempted to use Smart Previews instead of DNG, especially as it saves time during the import.
The only thing with Smart Previews is that they are limited if you like to zoom in to 100% in the Develop module. For example, portrait retouching is a good example of where you might want to do this. Smart Previews are smaller (2540 pixels along the longest edge) and that restricts how far you can zoom into the Smart Preview itself. If you want to zoom into 1:1 Lightroom Classic needs to build a new preview. You need DNG to maximize Lightroom Classic’s speed at this magnification.
You can learn more about Smart Previews in our tutorial The Ultimate Guide to Using Smart Previews in Lightroom Classic
Thanks for reading. You can get more great articles and tips about Lightroom Classic and photography in my popular Mastering Photography email newsletter. Join today and I’ll send you my ebook Introducing Lightroom Classic and 47 PhotoTips cards. Over 30,000 photographers subscribe. Enter your email now and join us.
And what about the downside of using DNG?
It was told me to not use DNG since RAW processing of RAF files is a work still in progress in LR.
If I convert my RAF files to DNG, then I will miss any new improvements in LR RAW processing of RAF files.
Is that right ?
Hi Miguel, I don’t think there is anything to worry about. When I convert RAF files to DNG and compare the two files in Lightroom I can’t see any difference between them. As to whether it’s possible that future versions of Lightroom may be able to process current RAF files, but not RAFs converted to DNG, better – that’s probably only something that a Lightroom software engineer could answer because it requires a deep understanding of the underlying processes in Lightroom.
One option you have is converting your RAF files to DNG and keeping your originals as part of a backup. You should aim to have at least three copies of your files anyway (for backup purposes) so this way you still have the originals in case you want to process them in a program that doesn’t recognize DNG (or for the scenario that future versions process RAF files better).
“You can think of Bridge as a precursor to Lightroom Classic. It’s a kind of file browser (it does more than that, but in simplest terms that’s what it does) used by photographers to keep track of their photos and open them in Photoshop.”
I disagree with this from your eMail. The great thing about Bridge & ACR, used in conjunction is that, unlike Lightroom, you can just drag a folder of images to Bridge without having to import them. That way you can delete the stuff you don’t want before importing them into Lightroom, thereby saving space and not slowing down Lightroom by importing images you’re never going to use. ACR has the identical editing tools Lightroom has, so whatever you do in Lightroom can be done there.
Hi Thomas, you’re right, that’s one use for Adobe Bridge. You could also use Photo Mechanic in a similar way. Both are useful for photographers shooting a high volume of photos.